independance day oO

[Teh noob]

since hb will change the gameplay , ive got this idea:
-remove all castle ownership and make them guarded by raids (and OP guards) according to levels. since u have the expirience from NM where all the landboss regions were guarded by mobs (couldnt find the suitable word, sorry) it will make possible for the players to pvp on different levels for different goals. so, for example if dion is guarded by 5x lvl raid (or raids) ppl will have to gather a party atleast, suitable for killing the guards, and the guarding mobs. if they re aggressive, in case someone captures the castle he/his clan will have to defend not only against any attacking party , but from spawned raids inside , thus making it harder to keep/get. ofc, if the loot is a problem it can be edited , and the quantity of chars made, reqiring decent gear etc etc will (probably) make it better for servers economy - more tax income for the castle owners from buying low grade gear , and cool bargains for the ones selling high grade in giran.

[enemy]

Sure not

[Teh noob]

ofc "not", this will make impossible to have castle ownership with 5 ppl active in clan because u will have to get 1 high level group to kill the usual castle guards, and lowlevel group with decent gear to kill the raids that spawn inside, regardless of  which side u are(def or attack). i would be very thankfull to explain with more than one word why u think thats not going to work. in case u lack english knowledge, use google translate, i promise i wont flame u for your ignorance.

[trippledouble]

I hate it lol

[Teh noob]

we already discussed the source of your fake importance, ingame and in this forum. if u have to say smth on the subject be welcome. but, it seems u re just another kid without oppinion, who wants to be noticed.

im terribly sorry about that.
vik.

[^Evacuate^]

we have already made some changes into castles and sieges,once we finish to discuss them whit all gms and drake we will publish it along whit main concept for tara,stay tuned.

[knoxville0531]

since hb will change the gameplay , ive got this idea:
-remove all castle ownership and make them guarded by raids (and OP guards) according to levels. since u have the expirience from NM where all the landboss regions were guarded by mobs (couldnt find the suitable word, sorry) it will make possible for the players to pvp on different levels for different goals. so, for example if dion is guarded by 5x lvl raid (or raids) ppl will have to gather a party atleast, suitable for killing the guards, and the guarding mobs. if they re aggressive, in case someone captures the castle he/his clan will have to defend not only against any attacking party , but from spawned raids inside , thus making it harder to keep/get. ofc, if the loot is a problem it can be edited , and the quantity of chars made, reqiring decent gear etc etc will (probably) make it better for servers economy - more tax income for the castle owners from buying low grade gear , and cool bargains for the ones selling high grade in giran.


a great idead published by teh noob lol just stop thx .... im sure u can find a server like this just google it,dont mess up this one

[GhostSlayer]

since hb will change the gameplay , ive got this idea:
-remove all castle ownership and make them guarded by raids (and OP guards) according to levels. since u have the expirience from NM where all the landboss regions were guarded by mobs (couldnt find the suitable word, sorry) it will make possible for the players to pvp on different levels for different goals. so, for example if dion is guarded by 5x lvl raid (or raids) ppl will have to gather a party atleast, suitable for killing the guards, and the guarding mobs. if they re aggressive, in case someone captures the castle he/his clan will have to defend not only against any attacking party , but from spawned raids inside , thus making it harder to keep/get. ofc, if the loot is a problem it can be edited , and the quantity of chars made, reqiring decent gear etc etc will (probably) make it better for servers economy - more tax income for the castle owners from buying low grade gear , and cool bargains for the ones selling high grade in giran.

lol pls don't ruin the server

[Teh noob]

like i said, if your nonsence makes u feel u re contributing somehow to keeping the server intact , u re terribly wrong. u better post some serious arguments or join kaballys "i want to b gm" endless threads vs gm lucid.

[UngO]

since hb will change the gameplay , ive got this idea:
-remove all castle ownership and make them guarded by raids (and OP guards) according to levels. since u have the expirience from NM where all the landboss regions were guarded by mobs (couldnt find the suitable word, sorry) it will make possible for the players to pvp on different levels for different goals. so, for example if dion is guarded by 5x lvl raid (or raids) ppl will have to gather a party atleast, suitable for killing the guards, and the guarding mobs. if they re aggressive, in case someone captures the castle he/his clan will have to defend not only against any attacking party , but from spawned raids inside , thus making it harder to keep/get. ofc, if the loot is a problem it can be edited , and the quantity of chars made, reqiring decent gear etc etc will (probably) make it better for servers economy - more tax income for the castle owners from buying low grade gear , and cool bargains for the ones selling high grade in giran.

you must be bored... not speakin of fact that your post didnt attract any possitive answer till now.

[Teh noob]

well, ppl im speaking with ig dont think so. i dont think that trolls, who do not give any reason why they disagree are the "negative reaction"u mentioned. plus, tbh, it looks more like someones desperate cry for some recognition , being "under influence of certain chemicals". its only an oppinion and disagreing with it is a part of a normal conversation. as long as u have facts, to prove that  the original tesis is actualy wrong. which doesnt happen.

so kkty bb.

[UngO]

well, ppl im speaking with ig dont think so. i dont think that trolls, who do not give any reason why they disagree are the "negative reaction"u mentioned. plus, tbh, it looks more like someones desperate cry for some recognition , being "under influence of certain chemicals". its only an oppinion and disagreing with it is a part of a normal conversation. as long as u have facts, to prove that  the original tesis is actualy wrong. which doesnt happen.

so kkty bb.

when you say you dont like something you dont have to prove that to noone lol or explain what leaded you to such decision except trolls like you said i dont see any other reactions who would agree with you in this too tho