dragon-community.net

Archive => Infinite Nightmare 20x server => Obsolete => General => Topic started by: Shreed on November 02, 2009, 10:30:11 AM

Title: Vicious Stance
Post by: Shreed on November 02, 2009, 10:30:11 AM
Vicious Stance. This is the skill of archers (not only archers) and should work with BOW !  it was blocked long time ago when archers was op. But now GIVE IT BACK !!!
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: kuko on November 02, 2009, 10:39:53 AM
Quote from: Shreed on November 02, 2009, 10:30:11 AM
Vicious Stance. This is the skill of archers (not only archers) and should work with BOW !  it was blocked long time ago when archers was op. But now GIVE IT BACK !!!
Mi lont paun mor.Mi ikarus not inaf.
I hope u are just kidding.
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: Shreed on November 02, 2009, 10:50:28 AM
Quote from: kuko on November 02, 2009, 10:39:53 AM
Mi lont paun mor.Mi ikarus not inaf.
I hope u are just kidding.

why kidding ? I tested and this skill dont work with bow ! and its all archers skill (whatever HE, PR, SR) and it should work with bow. Since  best crits on mage are 600 dmg (and 6k from other side)  why not turn it on ?
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: Sephiroth on November 02, 2009, 10:58:02 AM
Quote from: Shreed on November 02, 2009, 10:50:28 AM
why kidding ? I tested and this skill dont work with bow ! and its all archers skill (whatever HE, PR, SR) and it should work with bow. Since  best crits on mage are 600 dmg (and 6k from other side)  why not turn it on ?

Cos the 18% dmg boost will be removed.
Cos atribute system will be implemented.
Cos BladeStorm should be fixed.

Cos not everybody is a mage.

Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: kuko on November 02, 2009, 10:59:19 AM
Quote from: Sephiroth on November 02, 2009, 10:58:02 AM
...

Cos not everybody is a mage.
.....

or archer.
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: WindPhoenix on November 02, 2009, 11:08:54 AM
Quote from: kuko on November 02, 2009, 10:59:19 AM
or archer.
or tyrant/destroyer. can u imagine i got oneshotted in oly on TP by a tt/de? ;D
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: Shreed on November 02, 2009, 11:19:21 AM
Quote from: Sephiroth on November 02, 2009, 10:58:02 AM
Cos the 18% dmg boost will be  removed.
Cos atribute system will be implemented.
Cos BladeStorm should be fixed.

Cos not everybody is a mage.



yeah not everybody is a mage but everybody can take Windstorm/Bladestrom and go kill any archer he wanna.  will be, will be, should be be .... this is not argument give me fact !

And to WindPhoenix : but this skill is working on close range fighters :P i just wanna to give it back to archers !
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: kuko on November 02, 2009, 11:43:24 AM
I can't get smth.
Since HB came and icarus was implanted our forum was flood by QQ mages
now buff bar was changed and things go to QQ archers
No one even mention about vicious stance long long time and now when u felt raped u wanna find some way to pown again.Imo u already got it.Even wind storm u still got buged chant of protection and the INSANE DPS with icarus bow.
I want to remind it one more time.THERE ARE MORE CLASS IN L2 not only mage/archer.
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: tzuc on November 02, 2009, 11:46:03 AM
vicious stance should never work with bow, never has (except bugged private c4)
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: Shreed on November 02, 2009, 12:01:20 PM
Quote from: tzuc on November 02, 2009, 11:46:03 AM
vicious stance should never work with bow, never has (except bugged private c4)

Yhym :)

So why they are on Archers skills list ?? tell me why NC Soft put there this skill ? to spend SP for nothing.


And kuko its not about buffbar ... its about bladestorm/windstorm. Yes there are more class in L2 but no song/dances with +80% resist for fist waepon, +50% resist for dagger waepon etc...
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: Sephiroth on November 02, 2009, 12:04:05 PM
Quote from: Shreed on November 02, 2009, 11:19:21 AM
yeah not everybody is a mage but everybody can take Windstorm/Bladestrom and go kill any archer he wanna.  will be, will be, should be be .... this is not argument give me fact !

And to WindPhoenix : but this skill is working on close range fighters :P i just wanna to give it back to archers !

Those r facts,or u wanna just use all possible buffs,spam F1 and kill everybody with an OP bow?....(With atribute and bugged buffbar it would be like that).

Quote from: Shreed on November 02, 2009, 12:01:20 PM
Yhym :)

So why they are on Archers skills list ?? tell me why NC Soft put there this skill ? to spend SP for nothing.


And kuko its not about buffbar ... its about bladestorm/windstorm. Yes there are more class in L2 but no song/dances with +80% resist for fist waepon, +50% resist for dagger waepon etc...
Well,CoP affects daggers too ;)
Anyway,w/o WindStorm HB would be an archer network,and BladeStorm,as I told u,should be fixed.
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: Defoe on November 02, 2009, 12:09:35 PM
Quote from: tzuc on November 02, 2009, 11:46:03 AM
vicious stance should never work with bow, never has (except bugged private c4)
as i know it's should work but only with skills like double shot and lethal shot.
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: tzuc on November 02, 2009, 12:32:28 PM
Quote from: Defoe on November 02, 2009, 12:09:35 PM
as i know it's should work but only with skills like double shot and lethal shot.

i thought the same thing and remember telling my friend on retail why doesn't he use VS when using doubly shot in OLY, he said the +damage is like 100 when it crits, and with his gear his doubles do like 2500+ damage when crit in oly
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: seboulba on November 02, 2009, 05:15:55 PM
Quote from: WindPhoenix on November 02, 2009, 11:08:54 AM
or tyrant/destroyer. can u imagine i got oneshotted in oly on TP by a tt/de? ;D

u can 3 shoot a tyr/de outside so ....." and many echant skills dont work correctly :D"
Title: Re: Vicious Stance
Post by: Mr. Emiel on November 02, 2009, 06:01:21 PM
Quote from: tzuc on November 02, 2009, 11:46:03 AM
vicious stance should never work with bow, never has (except bugged private c4)
It did in C2...