dragon-community.net

Archive => Infinite Nightmare 20x server => Obsolete => Siege => Topic started by: EDDIE666 on November 29, 2009, 09:08:37 PM

Title: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: EDDIE666 on November 29, 2009, 09:08:37 PM
Finally  ..................... RLY RLY NICE/COOOOL SIEGE :)     GF
also nice baium pvp  :)                       gf
and also nice Valakas PvP :)              gf
rly  nice  actions today    gf
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: zenice on November 29, 2009, 09:53:05 PM
Quote from: EDDIE666 on November 29, 2009, 09:08:37 PM
Finally  ..................... RLY RLY NICE/COOOOL SIEGE :)     GF
also nice baium pvp  :)                       gf
and also nice Valakas PvP :)              gf
rly  nice  actions today    gf

lol i heard that zerg attempt fail.  ;D
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: Sali on November 30, 2009, 12:26:46 AM
Quote from: zenice on November 29, 2009, 09:53:05 PM
lol i heard that zerg attempt fail.  ;D
not a zerg but a fight in same numbers, even if we were more difrence wasnt big, and count being not in 1 ally as a huge disadvantage after we were geting debuffed by temps and buddies :P

anyway ye rly rly nice sieges we had in this weekend :)
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: Montana on November 30, 2009, 10:14:55 AM
Quote from: EDDIE666 on November 29, 2009, 09:08:37 PM
Finally  ..................... RLY RLY NICE/COOOOL SIEGE :)     GF
also nice baium pvp  :)                       gf
and also nice Valakas PvP :)              gf
rly  nice  actions today    gf
GF
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: EDDIE666 on November 30, 2009, 12:20:02 PM
Quote from: Montana on November 30, 2009, 10:14:55 AM
GF
:O  och  kastelo  :D is nice to seee when u say me GF :D
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: Montana on November 30, 2009, 12:42:54 PM
Quote from: EDDIE666 on November 30, 2009, 12:20:02 PM
:O  och  kastelo  :D is nice to seee when u say me GF :D
this GF goes to whole ally
not to u personally my friend ;)
because to kill u was for me not a problem  :D and the same goes for voudas also  :D
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: EDDIE666 on November 30, 2009, 01:59:16 PM
Quote from: Montana on November 30, 2009, 12:42:54 PM
this GF goes to whole ally
not to u personally my friend ;)
because to kill u was for me not a problem  :D and the same goes for voudas also  :D
hah :D  u was on this siege with archer  if i know :)   
and on this siege vas only 1 archer who kill me :)  ,,yoda,,  i dont know how  but he must have rly good acuracy :)
becasue other archers only mis :)  and u TOO :)  but yoda :/ +2pts for him :)
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: Sephiroth on November 30, 2009, 03:18:51 PM
Quote from: EDDIE666 on November 30, 2009, 01:59:16 PM
hah :D  u was on this siege with archer  if i know :)   
and on this siege vas only 1 archer who kill me :)  ,,yoda,,  i dont know how  but he must have rly good acuracy :)
becasue other archers only mis :)  and u TOO :)  but yoda :/ +2pts for him :)

Perhaps he use his brain and use Sniper tatoos to kill daggers with good Evasion.
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: Deavon on December 01, 2009, 01:03:59 AM
Nice one ,i rly need new cpu ,i cant afford that numbers without 1fps :/
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: Sali on December 01, 2009, 11:34:44 PM
Quote from: DarkMagician on December 01, 2009, 02:46:45 PM
well yes in past we zerged sometimes but sometimes we were wining w/o zerg - the word zerg is created as an excuse when some1 is losing :P
i can have even more excuses.
1st ur zerging
2nd we were not in 1 ally
3rd was our 1st siege together
4th....
and so on. As u see excuses are excuses but fact that ur almost always much more. And ye guys if winning come so easy for u why ur all the time asking some asslicker to help u  ::)
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: seboulba on December 02, 2009, 06:34:39 PM
Quote from: Ungolianth on December 02, 2009, 02:13:39 AM
atm u pissed me off
1st u was more and we was not zerging since all siege we defended in castle lol face fact we just winned u
2nd ur was not 1 ally? juts ur faking fault and its lame excuse and not our fault
3rd 1st siege ?:D u all play long enough here so dont use same lame excuses lol i feel sad for u
and about asslickers sali who had the ally of noobs together with u? :D the red ****s naaps?? if u mean the yellow clan that was with us they are old temp members so once more u totaly failed in this topic...ok i now wait ur excuse...realize facts and cya gl

RACIST !!!!!!!!!!!! .i.
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: mortal on December 02, 2009, 09:27:03 PM
Quote from: Ungolianth on December 02, 2009, 02:13:39 AM
atm u pissed me off
1st u was more and we was not zerging since all siege we defended in castle lol face fact we just winned u
2nd ur was not 1 ally? juts ur faking fault and its lame excuse and not our fault
3rd 1st siege ?:D u all play long enough here so dont use same lame excuses lol i feel sad for u
and about asslickers sali who had the ally of noobs together with u? :D the red ****s naaps?? if u mean the yellow clan that was with us they are old temp members so once more u totaly failed in this topic...ok i now wait ur excuse...realize facts and cya gl
idiot .i.
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: Sali on December 02, 2009, 10:35:03 PM
Quote from: Ungolianth on December 02, 2009, 02:13:39 AM
atm u pissed me off
1st u was more and we was not zerging since all siege we defended in castle lol face fact we just winned u
2nd ur was not 1 ally? juts ur faking fault and its lame excuse and not our fault
3rd 1st siege ?:D u all play long enough here so dont use same lame excuses lol i feel sad for u
and about asslickers sali who had the ally of noobs together with u? :D the red ****s naaps?? if u mean the yellow clan that was with us they are old temp members so once more u totaly failed in this topic...ok i now wait ur excuse...realize facts and cya gl
the "red **** naabs" were with us cause last (giran?) siege even when they were not with us ur yellow pals were there making ur zerg even bigger. 1 ally is not our fault ? well dude to be straight with u, not ever1 like eachothers thats why we cant make 1 ally and most think its better to stay like that than be part of nonnamed zerg just to get items and "feel" pro "killing" (zerging) every1(as an example take ur czech friends that played in epic and eb just to get items, preety lame a? ). And fact that we zerged at rune is a pure bs, since we rly were many, but now u can have an imagination how many u are since we were in rly similiar number. And ur anger just shows that im kinda right :)
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: Sali on December 03, 2009, 01:34:59 PM
Quote from: Ungolianth on December 03, 2009, 10:46:08 AM
i am angry cuz sali ur old enogh and good player to still use the same excuses...maybeif u say just gf and cya on next siege i will say u gf and gl mate
yo i said it at the begining but later some temp mofo came with this cokcy- "we no zerg and we win" so rest of post was just a counter for this
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: Sali on December 03, 2009, 04:50:56 PM
Quote from: Ungolianth on December 03, 2009, 03:09:50 PM
;)
<3
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: EDDIE666 on December 03, 2009, 05:36:10 PM
GAYs :D
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: EDDIE666 on December 04, 2009, 11:29:51 AM
ty ficurisko jedno :D
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: M3tta on December 05, 2009, 02:17:57 PM
Quote from: Ungolianth on December 02, 2009, 02:13:39 AM
the red ****s naaps

freak you ungo  :D ow and btw... since when the polish are naaps on nm? if i remember well, polish clans were always at the top. (av,ftr,sheva etc...)
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: our4n0s on December 05, 2009, 11:02:53 PM
so boring topic, get skills at flaming tbh
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: M3tta on December 05, 2009, 11:55:26 PM
flames times ended altheo. get serious.
Title: Re: Rune 29,111 2009
Post by: nivael on December 21, 2009, 06:27:05 PM
Haaaaaaaa ;D QQ GF :D