dragon-community.net

Archive => Valkyria 9x server (Merged with Dragon x15) => Obsolete => General => Topic started by: nietrzezwy on July 25, 2010, 03:46:59 PM

Title: What is better ?
Post by: nietrzezwy on July 25, 2010, 03:46:59 PM
Guys I have a question, what is better to do    sub   bd/archer or bd/nuker              the same with sws/archer or sws/nuker ? what is better and why ? plz no retarded replies :P thanks mates !
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: Akira on July 25, 2010, 03:48:08 PM
and you want mainly to have it for pvp, or for pve? : )
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: nietrzezwy on July 25, 2010, 03:57:54 PM
both ;> what is better where ? would you recommand that subs ? coz I need to have either sws or bd + nuker or archer and dunno what to choose !:(
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: k0dex on July 25, 2010, 04:51:34 PM
Archer is better but FULLBUFFED, if you wanna go on self mage is better.
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: nietrzezwy on July 25, 2010, 04:57:15 PM
doom cryer + songs + dances is enough to call FULLBUFFED ? will I win being sws/sr fully buffed with, lets say, sh/sk only on PP buffs ? need more opinions
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: HouseIND on July 25, 2010, 06:57:20 PM
Stop assuming these stuffs , join some clan if you aren't in one , don't dual box your buffer .bcuz you will never find random free pvps on this server .personally /tank always if you want good char for pvp , sh/bd really good farmer
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: Akira on July 25, 2010, 07:06:26 PM
IMO for pve better bd/sh but if you want to pvp more bd/pr .
Since almost everyone rolls to fighter (archers) classes, it's better to have an archer.
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: bsrealm on July 25, 2010, 10:12:50 PM
Also depends on what clan you are on - if they are archer based - archer, mage based - mage :)

Mage: Ideal for BD, pretty much don't need SWS unless long duration or mass killing in really large numbers
Archer: You need SWS for hunter to greatly enchance your dps. So SWS has more of a tilt towards archer and BD more of a tilt towards mage.

If you have WC, BD/SWS and kinda full buff anyway it comes down to a "what is better (d)elf archer or (d)elf mages" kinda question. I don't want to get into that :P

Other factors include - what class you like to play; what gear you can get/have, etc
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: k0dex on July 25, 2010, 11:53:52 PM
Quote from: nietrzezwy on July 25, 2010, 04:57:15 PM
doom cryer + songs + dances is enough to call FULLBUFFED ? will I win being sws/sr fully buffed with, lets say, sh/sk only on PP buffs ? need more opinions
sr/sws >sh/sh , its long fight but with wind potion, storm guard and elemental protection, you are untouchable for him, if you use cp pots you can win on pp buffs with this guy.
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: andreas32 on July 26, 2010, 02:02:32 AM
Sr/sws in good hands can simply become  a killing machine and a great support for an archer party specially with advantage of counter rapid fire.
Also in a good gear the attack speed is just crazy,1.7k atk spd would be sort of midium in proper buffs and the p.atk wouldn't be bad also if we compare the atk spd and p.atk of other archers with sr we see that p.atk may be better for he and PR but the atk spd of SR covers the gap and becomes even more profitable. :P
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: 6bIK on July 26, 2010, 02:02:34 PM
Quote from: k0dex on July 25, 2010, 04:51:34 PM
Archer is better but FULLBUFFED, if you wanna go on self mage is better.

sh/bd need same fullbuff, imo pr/bd
Title: Re: What is better ?
Post by: bsrealm on July 26, 2010, 03:03:33 PM
You just want to oppose kodex and not talk on topic. Sigh.