GF to evryone
nice siege
a lot of zerg
a lot of pvp
a lot of fun
a lot of sides
gz for owners and gf
+
a lot of lags
;D
Quote from: chlipus on January 30, 2011, 07:14:36 PM
GF to evryone
nice siege
a lot of zerg
a lot of pvp
a lot of fun
a lot of sides
gz for owners and gf
+1
Who won?
Which siege?
Which sides existed?
who frapsed ? ;D
Quote from: Deavon on January 30, 2011, 07:42:17 PM
Who won?
Which siege?
Which sides existed?
Renessance
Giran
all sides :)
Quote from: seboulba on January 30, 2011, 08:41:47 PM
Renessance
Giran
all sides :)
Is that an INF or NM clan? :o
I wonder if clans from different servers allied each other or they made server sides.
Quote from: DrAkhoo on January 30, 2011, 09:36:17 PM
I wonder if clans from different servers allied each other or they made server sides.
Some did.
GF, nice siege
I heard that yellow crest guys were with temp
BH is allied with some INF clan (didn't see the name)
Yellow guys looks to be a lot ;D ;D
Quote from: Neozinhu on January 30, 2011, 10:52:14 PM
I heard that yellow crest guys were with temp
BH is allied with some INF clan (didn't see the name)
Yellow guys looks to be a lot ;D ;D
well at start it was TEMP/WS/BlackArmy vs Ego - Aod+BH, in the middle of siege it was TEMP+WS vs EGO+BlackArmy vs Aod+BH XD
Quote from: seboulba on January 30, 2011, 11:02:58 PM
well at start it was TEMP/WS/BlackArmy vs Ego - Aod+BH, in the middle of siege it was TEMP+WS vs EGO+BlackArmy vs Aod+BH XD
In other words... fun ;D
So temps tripled their numbers ? O_o
Thats bad news for the server but good news for BH and AOD .
Quote from: seboulba on January 30, 2011, 11:02:58 PM
well at start it was TEMP/WS/BlackArmy vs Ego - Aod+BH, in the middle of siege it was TEMP+WS vs EGO+BlackArmy vs Aod+BH XD
Funny... WS and BA have/are in ally, so HOW the FOK could they fight? :P
Quote from: PolSilv3r on January 31, 2011, 01:43:07 AM
Funny... WS and BA have/are in ally, so HOW the FOK could they fight? :P
AoD and BH are in ally
WS are the ones with yellow crest?
Quote from: Neozinhu on January 31, 2011, 03:36:46 AM
AoD and BH are in ally
WS are the ones with yellow crest?
Yes.
Yes.
Quote from: PolSilv3r on January 31, 2011, 01:43:07 AM
Funny... WS and BA have/are in ally, so HOW the FOK could they fight? :P
ask them :D (we leave the ally after siege from WS :) )
After first zerg fight (Temp+BA+WS) I asked on ally chat that will we attack Temp? Because I had agreed with them to do so inside siege zone. We went to take a castle after all. I didn't see any clue why an ally like our with 45+ online had to hide deep in Temp's ass which is currently the leading alliance on server?
Turning point was one PM, "Ok Temp takes Giran and BA Innadril." No thanks, who da fok will beat so many people while having tremendous delay when sides clash? So I refused it, our ally split, BA declared war on Temp, WS went to kill Egocentrics. I rather helped to Egocentrics than watcing how can 90 ppl zerg for profits other 40? and dunno how much from AoD+BH. Ridiculous.
max we have 46ppl
but great temp wait for aden siege ;D
GF to all enemys and thx to all friends.
a lot of fun and a lot of ppl, it was rly a nice siege
Quote from: Montana on January 31, 2011, 01:57:20 PM
GF to all enemys and thx to all friends.
a lot of fun and a lot of ppl, it was rly a nice siege
+1 i hope its not the first and the last one
Quote from: DarkMagician on January 31, 2011, 06:27:08 PM
1st of all GF to all, rly cool siege, second i don't udnerstand why the fack Egos took Giran, it had to be for BlackArmy, they fought good, with honor and fair, without any insults and flames on chat. TBH i like these new guys, AOD, WS, BA all of them i like them, they r not like Egos and BH etc....If u ask me the castle should be for them.
BA its for me = BrokenAngels
BlackArmy cant be BA :) lets call this clan just Army
or something like this.. i dunno
Quote from: Montana on January 31, 2011, 07:29:33 PM
BA its for me = BrokenAngels
BlackArmy cant be BA :) lets call this clan just Army
or something like this.. i dunno
:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Quote from: DarkMagician on January 31, 2011, 06:27:08 PM
1st of all GF to all, rly cool siege, second i don't udnerstand why the fack Egos took Giran, it had to be for BlackArmy, they fought good, with honor and fair, without any insults and flames on chat. TBH i like these new guys, AOD, WS, BA all of them i like them, they r not like Egos and BH etc....If u ask me the castle should be for them.
Fack Ego? LOL
litle respect pls...
we got the castle with rly low ppl and 40% from Ego ppl with rly sux items...
if we ask you no castle for us and all for temp...
but... the power win in the last siege.
Quote from: DarkMagician on January 31, 2011, 06:27:08 PM
1st of all GF to all, rly cool siege, second i don't udnerstand why the fack Egos took Giran, it had to be for BlackArmy, they fought good, with honor and fair, without any insults and flames on chat. TBH i like these new guys, AOD, WS, BA all of them i like them, they r not like Egos and BH etc....If u ask me the castle should be for them.
as 1 of their cl alrdy u said u wanted to take giran for temps anyway and give them innadril . ( prollly u knew they r not even registered xD )
second both servers merged so it doesnt mean like we ve to give them more privileges cause they r new cause for them we r new also . we won in fair fight and gz to temps and aod for good figth on siege was nice
Quote from: Tukan on January 31, 2011, 12:18:30 PM
After first zerg fight (Temp+BA+WS) I asked on ally chat that will we attack Temp? Because I had agreed with them to do so inside siege zone. We went to take a castle after all. I didn't see any clue why an ally like our with 45+ online had to hide deep in Temp's ass which is currently the leading alliance on server?
Turning point was one PM, "Ok Temp takes Giran and BA Innadril." No thanks, who da fok will beat so many people while having tremendous delay when sides clash? So I refused it, our ally split, BA declared war on Temp, WS went to kill Egocentrics. I rather helped to Egocentrics than watcing how can 90 ppl zerg for profits other 40? and dunno how much from AoD+BH. Ridiculous.
Finally one wise guy with nice thinking..u figured out in 1 day what this server didnt in 4 years.
Regards
Quote from: alinutza on January 31, 2011, 09:09:38 PM
Finally one wise guy with nice thinking..u figured out in 1 day what this server didnt in 4 years.
Regards
all of the above :D
Quote from: Tukan on January 31, 2011, 12:18:30 PM
After first zerg fight (Temp+BA+WS) I asked on ally chat that will we attack Temp? Because I had agreed with them to do so inside siege zone. We went to take a castle after all. I didn't see any clue why an ally like our with 45+ online had to hide deep in Temp's ass which is currently the leading alliance on server?
Turning point was one PM, "Ok Temp takes Giran and BA Innadril." No thanks, who da fok will beat so many people while having tremendous delay when sides clash? So I refused it, our ally split, BA declared war on Temp, WS went to kill Egocentrics. I rather helped to Egocentrics than watcing how can 90 ppl zerg for profits other 40? and dunno how much from AoD+BH. Ridiculous.
After server merge BA declare that they dont want keep ally with WS.
I can live with that.
We didnt sign to any sieges so we make deal with Temp (they where first from NM who talk with us after merge). It was deal between Temp and WS. Tukann have been informed about this.
BA come to siege. NIce?
BA try to make some other deal with Temp without informing WS about this? Cool. But its their deal.
They dont want Innadril? Its not my problem.
In the middle of siege they change mind and start war against Temp? I don't care. Its their decision.
btw
I just log i see that we still have ally.
:-D
Anyway it was very nice siege
Quote from: mahala on January 31, 2011, 10:36:16 PM
After server merge BA declare that they dont want keep ally with WS.
I can live with that.
We didnt sign to any sieges so we make deal with Temp (they where first from NM who talk with us after merge). It was deal between Temp and WS. Tukann have been informed about this.
BA come to siege. NIce?
BA try to make some other deal with Temp without informing WS about this? Cool. But its their deal.
They dont want Innadril? Its not my problem.
In the middle of siege they change mind and start war against Temp? I don't care. Its their decision.
btw
I just log i see that we still have ally.
:-D
Anyway it was very nice siege
you think, join "dominate" side is best what u can do?
Quote from: trooperXkoki on February 01, 2011, 01:09:15 AM
you think, join "dominate" side is best what u can do?
temp wont refuse meat shields, u know ;D
u all make replys here but let me ask u 1 thing:
why if some1 want to join temp side are flamed everytime and temps are called ass lickers , but if they join ur side they are just pro that didn't choose to join the big "zerg"? u have to accept the fact that in giran siege , temps had same numbers with egos , w/o ws and Barmy , when they helped Temp at begining , we zerged yes but when they helped egos in end , u zerged so cut the crap with this zerg sh1t cause is kinda old and better keep ur side together and stop blame everytime Temp for ur fail.
GF for Giran Siege , indeed was great action!
I wasnt @ giran siege, wasnt even in any clan...
Quote from: Catos on February 01, 2011, 02:11:09 AM
why if some1 want to join temp side are flamed everytime and temps are called ass lickers , but if they join ur side they are just pro that didn't choose to join the big "zerg"?
The point isnt join the bigger or the smaller side, they have the choice...
But i think that, if temp rly "ruled" the server during the last months, u can handle with new enemies (more sides, not only temp x anti temp), w/o ask for more help.
And tbh....BH + AoD apparently have nice numbers O_O . . .
For now i'll comment here only and watch to sieges, have to gather stuff again.
Sry for bad english
Quote from: Catos on February 01, 2011, 02:11:09 AM
u all make replys here but let me ask u 1 thing:
why if some1 want to join temp side are flamed everytime and temps are called ass lickers , but if they join ur side they are just pro that didn't choose to join the big "zerg"? u have to accept the fact that in giran siege , temps had same numbers with egos , w/o ws and Barmy , when they helped Temp at begining , we zerged yes but when they helped egos in end , u zerged so cut the crap with this zerg sh1t cause is kinda old and better keep ur side together and stop blame everytime Temp for ur fail.
GF for Giran Siege , indeed was great action!
This is true, but unlike Temp, Egocentrics made no deal with anyone before sieges, promise no castle in return of help or whatsoever. Help from BlackArmy came in the midlle of siege and was based on a nice thinking of one leader from infinity who realised zerg is no fun.
You want to tell me that Temp promissed Inadril for infinity clans while they supose to keep Giran because u were so sure of victory vs all participants or u just relied on a zerg that could assure u that?
Anyway in the end were good fights and a lot of fun.
Quote from: alinutza on February 01, 2011, 12:10:21 PM
who realised zerg is no fun.
like i said , we had same numbers so if they would join any side , that side would zerg , like we did at the beggining , and like u did from half siege so i repeat , zerg sh1t is kinda old.
and for ur info , ask their leader Tukann , we had no pact , the only agreement we had was not hit each others outside siege zone , in siege zone we could do what we want but they didn't started to hit us so we didn't hit them also ; when they started to hit us , we striked back , is easy i think ( i speak about Barmy here) but anyway GF the only thing that matters is that we have lot of fun now and this is great for all the server.
NM+INFINITY VS TEMP? dont say that you forget what u said...kidding me catos?
Quote from: mahala on January 31, 2011, 10:36:16 PM
We didnt sign to any sieges so we make deal with Temp (they where first from NM who talk with us after merge[/color
At the end it doesnt matter, was fun, and thats why we play this game
GF for all sides, nice siege
Quote from: Locus on February 01, 2011, 01:11:21 PM
At the end it doesnt matter, was fun, and thats why we play this game
GF for all sides, nice siege
he is not from Barmy , check again my post.
Quote from: trooperXkoki on February 01, 2011, 01:08:59 PM
NM+INFINITY VS TEMP? dont say that you forget what u said...kidding me catos?
and is not like this?expect WS clan that yes they help us.
Quote from: Catos on February 01, 2011, 12:32:24 PM
like i said , we had same numbers so if they would join any side , that side would zerg , like we did at the beggining , and like u did from half siege so i repeat , zerg sh1t is kinda old.
how we started to zerg iff blackarmy was with us and wladcysmokow with u cause i dont get this part lol . we were equal number's but yeah iff temps loose smthing they must be zerged only same old story
Quote from: jygh on February 01, 2011, 01:30:50 PM
how we started to zerg iff blackarmy was with us and wladcysmokow with u cause i dont get this part lol . we were equal number's but yeah iff temps loose smthing they must be zerged only same old story
wasn't me who started this crap with zerg again and i didn't even complained about it so i don't get ur post. I Saw only 1 pt from WS in Giran siege but ye we are the one who cry . U're funny :D
Quote from: Catos on February 01, 2011, 01:33:58 PM
wasn't me who started this crap with zerg again and i didn't even complained about it so i don't get ur post. I Saw only 1 pt from WS in Giran siege but ye we are the one who cry . U're funny :D
iff someone say smtihng u dislike he must be crying ?? why should i cry iff we won lol . and well dunno how u could see just 1 pt xD i saw around 2-3
Quote from: jygh on February 01, 2011, 01:36:31 PM
iff someone say smtihng u dislike he must be crying ?? why should i cry iff we won lol . and well dunno how u could see just 1 pt xD i saw around 2-3
do not confuse giran siege with inadrill one :D
i am not saying u crying now , i just say u cry in general :D ( i make fun don't flame me :X )
infi players are okay..with intelligence , and playing without any flame , GZ.
Quote from: scary on February 01, 2011, 01:43:43 PM
infi players are okay..with intelligence , and playing without any flame , GZ.
Regarding this part, NM ppl have a lot to learn from infinity guyz. Totally agree with u..
Quote from: scary on February 01, 2011, 01:43:43 PM
infi players are okay..with intelligence , and playing without any flame , GZ.
Actually flaming is what makes this forum alive and makes the game more interesting, since killing the shit talkers is always much more fun :)
I think everyone wants to get some piece of this cake here;)
Regarding us, Infi players. Give us some time guys it's not like we all decided with whom we should ally ourselves (except AoD they have they side already). Time will show how we'll set these new fronts of war.
As for WS since our ally BA is looking for new side we had to decide what best option for us is. Temps were only ones, as mahala wrote, that tried to communicate with us but who knows what will future bring here.
Cheers for everyone and have a good pvp time 8)
Quote from: trooperXkoki on February 01, 2011, 01:08:59 PM
NM+INFINITY VS TEMP? dont say that you forget what u said...kidding me catos?
atm only BH+AoD fight against all. But it's good for us, game is much more interesting couse of this. We have challenge and target. So it's perfect.
Now I wanna log so much like few years ago.
ps. thx for nice words about inf players ;)
Quote from: lasombra on February 01, 2011, 03:23:50 PM
atm only BH+AoD fight against all. But it's good for us, game is much more interesting couse of this. We have challenge and target. So it's perfect.
Now I wanna log so much like few years ago.
ps. thx for nice words about inf players ;)
+1
great pvp yesterday. long time since I didnt had such fun.
;D
Quote from: TomekAlmighty on February 01, 2011, 02:55:56 PM
Actually flaming is what makes this forum alive and makes the game more interesting, since killing the shit talkers is always much more fun :)
there is time for flame, and for play.. they are not playing .. there is ppl`s who was flaming all siege
Quote from: lasombra on February 01, 2011, 03:23:50 PM
Now I wanna log so much like few years ago.
ps. thx for nice words about inf players ;)
Same here Felissin :) Thou i'm stuck in Krakow without net at home..damn this job><
Quote from: lasombra on February 01, 2011, 03:23:50 PM
atm only BH+AoD fight against all.
oh really? means we have alliance with egos and i didn't knew :)
Quote from: mahala on January 31, 2011, 10:36:16 PM
After server merge BA declare that they dont want keep ally with WS.
I can live with that.
We didnt sign to any sieges so we make deal with Temp (they where first from NM who talk with us after merge). It was deal between Temp and WS. Tukann have been informed about this.
BA come to siege. NIce?
BA try to make some other deal with Temp without informing WS about this? Cool. But its their deal.
They dont want Innadril? Its not my problem.
In the middle of siege they change mind and start war against Temp? I don't care. Its their decision.
btw
I just log i see that we still have ally.
:-D
Anyway it was very nice siege
U wrote that BA didn't informed WS about conversation with TEMP ? Well U didn't informed Us too. And to your infromation TEMP leader pmed Tukann. He was curious about our intentions. He explained that their ally is currently full, pacts like *not to hit each other* will not really work, because they kill everyone inside siege zone. He also told that they tried similar things in the past and it didn't work, people have to care about lots of things not to kill anyone from neutral clan(s). In the end Tukann agreed that we will take care our enemies first (BA kills AoD, Temp kill Egocentrics and AoD too), but inside siege zone we will fight with each other. He said "fair enough".
Why we should make stronger big alliance ? It's totally without any sense. U wanna again to create huge alliance what will pwn whole serwer, and after few months all will be angry that there is no PvP avalaible ?
U decided today what U wanna do.
So pliz leave ally.
(Yes U have still alliance, couze my CL is without network connection - U should keep at least some respect for my clan ...)
BA stop cry -.-
Quote from: WindWalk on February 01, 2011, 06:50:39 PM
U wrote that BA didn't informed WS about conversation with TEMP ? Well U didn't informed Us too. And to your infromation TEMP leader pmed Tukann. He was curious about our intentions. He explained that their ally is currently full, pacts like *not to hit each other* will not really work, because they kill everyone inside siege zone. He also told that they tried similar things in the past and it didn't work, people have to care about lots of things not to kill anyone from neutral clan(s). In the end Tukann agreed that we will take care our enemies first (BA kills AoD, Temp kill Egocentrics and AoD too), but inside siege zone we will fight with each other. He said "fair enough".
Why we should make stronger big alliance ? It's totally without any sense. U wanna again to create huge alliance what will pwn whole serwer, and after few months all will be angry that there is no PvP avalaible ?
U decided today what U wanna do.
So pliz leave ally.
(Yes U have still alliance, couze my CL is without network connection - U should keep at least some respect for my clan ...)
Wind i don't wana be a pain in the ass but here's some PM's from Tukann day before Merge (part of bigger msg-if you like i can pm it to you).
1) We were able to do some nice things, but I don't wana keep this alliance on 'new server'
2)I was thinking about asking/inviting good players from WS to BA
It's not a matter of disrespect here mate. Tukann preferred to quite this ally and find new place for BA + he officially informed us that he would like to take some WS players.
To put it simple it looked like:
"Hi WS it was nice to play along thou i have different plans on new merged server so thats the end of our ally. Oh btw i'll try to take as many of you as i can. Cheers!".
So Wind. No disrespect for BA. I do like you guys(even without Kapa- he was my favorite) i hope we'll be able to play again in future but for now Tukanns decision was quite clear..screw you we're out and looking for something better.
Quote from: WindWalk on February 01, 2011, 06:50:39 PM
U wrote that BA didn't informed WS about conversation with TEMP ? Well U didn't informed Us too. And to your infromation TEMP leader pmed Tukann. He was curious about our intentions. He explained that their ally is currently full, pacts like *not to hit each other* will not really work, because they kill everyone inside siege zone. He also told that they tried similar things in the past and it didn't work, people have to care about lots of things not to kill anyone from neutral clan(s). In the end Tukann agreed that we will take care our enemies first (BA kills AoD, Temp kill Egocentrics and AoD too), but inside siege zone we will fight with each other. He said "fair enough".
lol u didn't missed anything , was exactly my words there and i think wasn't u the one with who i spoke ... so how do u know them exactly? are u some kind of GM-san? :D
PS: here u go our "friendship" pact with Barmy that u all was speaking about at the beggining of the siege and crying like little babies like u always do it.....mby now u can stop speak bullsh1ts if u do not know a sh1t about some things.
Quote from: Catos on February 01, 2011, 08:10:13 PM
lol u didn't missed anything , was exactly my words there and i think wasn't u the one with who i spoke ... so how do u know them exactly? are u some kind of GM-san? :D
I have them on my forum :)
I didn't wanna missed nothing.
p.s.
U can call me THEA-san :D
Quote from: JoeDoe on February 01, 2011, 07:12:43 PM
BA stop cry -.-
As usuall very important comment - dunno why, couze I really rare cry about stg, usually not couze of game.
Quote from: fenrris on February 01, 2011, 07:23:45 PM
Wind i don't wana be a pain in the ass but here's some PM's from Tukann day before Merge (part of bigger msg-if you like i can pm it to you).
1) We were able to do some nice things, but I don't wana keep this alliance on 'new server'
2)I was thinking about asking/inviting good players from WS to BA
It's not a matter of disrespect here mate. Tukann preferred to quite this ally and find new place for BA + he officially informed us that he would like to take some WS players.
To put it simple it looked like:
"Hi WS it was nice to play along thou i have different plans on new merged server so thats the end of our ally. Oh btw i'll try to take as many of you as i can. Cheers!".
So Wind. No disrespect for BA. I do like you guys(even without Kapa- he was my favorite) i hope we'll be able to play again in future but for now Tukanns decision was quite clear..screw you we're out and looking for something better.
Well for sure I don't know all things about conversation Tukann with other ppl, but ...
For sure I don't like this "siege action" - for me it was totally stupid, kid behavour. We was without any orders, focked by leader deep in ass. But happens, we can't be perfect, we're just ppl. All can make a mistake.
I'm just ... hmmm ... lets call it sad that again stg was focked couze of BOTH sides.
And don't argue with me Sethan :P
I'm not sethan Thea!!
And yeah think communication was kinda messy here. Well wish you well wherever you guys go:) I Know it's just game and we should enjoy it as long as we can thou after my 6 years experience in our " close to family" clan quiting with "youre no longer usefull asset for us" is kinda cold ::)
Quote from: fenrris on February 01, 2011, 08:48:37 PM
I'm not sethan Thea!!
And yeah think communication was kinda messy here. Well wish you well wherever you guys go:) I Know it's just game and we should enjoy it as long as we can thou after my 6 years experience in our " close to family" clan quiting with "youre no longer usefull asset for us" is kinda cold ::)
Nab I' talking to JoeDoe ;P
--------------------------------------
stop talking here pls.
u can make all ur friendships.. next siege we kill u and ur friends :D its a easy thing
gl
atm its my castle :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o haha
Quote from: fenrris on February 01, 2011, 08:48:37 PM
I'm not sethan Thea!!
And yeah think communication was kinda messy here. Well wish you well wherever you guys go:) I Know it's just game and we should enjoy it as long as we can thou after my 6 years experience in our " close to family" clan quiting with "youre no longer usefull asset for us" is kinda cold ::)
btw im back as Cabaal,dont worry ^^
only about Tukann's behaviour to dont let you in missunderstanding.
Tukann - as i know - really planned to dismiss ally before merge, but it wasnt 100% decided. Just before the merge there were some argue on allychat and it made the allywork together impossible, thats why he was thinking about it. And wasnt like: "Ok from my side this ally is shit,but please guys come to BA" - but was look like that some ppl from WS were thinking to choose BA's way - as Darhed before - they have got an opened door,since we all know that WS are skilled,experienced players,and also still FRIENDS. So there wasnt anything against WS as clan. I think every clan need a characteristic leader,who always make clear decisions, certain ways. Elsselar is a good guy,i really like him, but probably this role is not the best for him. Im not say the WS is bad couse chosen another way,its whatever, just please dont let your leader in sh it, help him in decisions to make them more clearer.
BTW: im sad, just back to play and we move apart from my favourite clan: WS :(
Quote from: Kapa on February 02, 2011, 09:29:13 AM
btw im back as Cabaal,dont worry ^^
only about Tukann's behaviour to dont let you in missunderstanding.
Tukann - as i know - really planned to dismiss ally before merge, but it wasnt 100% decided. Just before the merge there were some argue on allychat and it made the allywork together impossible, thats why he was thinking about it. And wasnt like: "Ok from my side this ally is shit,but please guys come to BA" - but was look like that some ppl from WS were thinking to choose BA's way - as Darhed before - they have got an opened door,since we all know that WS are skilled,experienced players,and also still FRIENDS. So there wasnt anything against WS as clan. I think every clan need a characteristic leader,who always make clear decisions, certain ways. Elsselar is a good guy,i really like him, but probably this role is not the best for him. Im not say the WS is bad couse chosen another way,its whatever, just please dont let your leader in sh it, help him in decisions to make them more clearer.
BTW: im sad, just back to play and we move apart from my favourite clan: WS :(
HAH nice to see you again noobzor ;D
If it goes about clear decisions. Yes Tukann was clear- we are no longer useful(to few of us- thou recently it was mostly WS online and few BA). Yes such statement is clear ,thou from our perspective, not once we were outside big allies and we played just for fun and not to "get" stuff( and yes we usually had 1/2 castles). So this is more of game philosophy ;)
PS: just you wait when i'll finally be online first LS goes to you :P
hehe,if i will see you i will turn on fortitude xD
BTW in my opinion:
whatever what are the viewpoints, BA and WS also good clans with good persons, dont make angry and burn the bridge between us, useless, from different sides and in war even we dont have to insult eachothers, im sure we will be on same side,probably in same ally 3rd time too xD just keep up respect for all :)
Quote from: Kapa on February 02, 2011, 02:58:45 PM
hehe,if i will see you i will turn on fortitude xD
BTW in my opinion:
whatever what are the viewpoints, BA and WS also good clans with good persons, dont make angry and burn the bridge between us, useless, from different sides and in war even we dont have to insult eachothers, im sure we will be on same side,probably in same ally 3rd time too xD just keep up respect for all :)
Kido don't worry about that. ;) After all this is just a game and we both know from last 5 years that yesterday enemies can be tomorrow friends.
Besides since when good old WS were burning bridges? Not our style.
Mhm... Why do you talk about it?
There is no more ally but we are still playing.
So what is the point of that discussion? ???
Quote from: PolSilv3r on February 02, 2011, 03:59:20 PM
Mhm... Why do you talk about it?
There is no more ally but we are still playing.
So what is the point of that discussion? ???
And the biggesr spammer which one I ever met said this :D :D
Quote from: Nathela on February 04, 2011, 01:47:52 AM
And the biggesr spammer which one I ever met said this :D :D
I am not a spammer ::) And all my posts are rly usefull and some ppl even print them and pray to me ;D