dragon-community.net

Archive => Infinite Nightmare 20x server => Obsolete => Siege => Topic started by: Blondy on November 10, 2007, 09:43:07 PM

Title: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: Blondy on November 10, 2007, 09:43:07 PM
and you can start to flame :P, you can post nice screens and etc..

btw. i <3 DC vs all  :P, best siege for last 5 months

edit: ty to milicia  :-*
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Neozinhu on November 10, 2007, 09:44:37 PM
i not go to sieges today....


who got...(or keep) the castle?
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Blondy on November 10, 2007, 09:48:43 PM
unforgotten keep the castel- great defending!!
attacking syndicate+temp+fearless (to take us from giran away  :'( )
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Neozinhu on November 10, 2007, 09:53:28 PM
Quote from: Blondy on November 10, 2007, 09:48:43 PM
unforgotten keep the castel- great defending!!
attacking syndicate+temp+fearless (to take us from giran away  :'( )

hehe


SS pl0xx
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: KmD on November 10, 2007, 09:56:48 PM
Some screens plox and start a topic about Giran siege plox
I wonder who are Liarma or smth
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Probocis on November 10, 2007, 09:59:41 PM
on giran ftr take castel for 10 min or im wrong? :)
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: darkling on November 10, 2007, 10:13:33 PM
If someone tells me that DC is 'zerging' the server it will be the best joke ever ^^

Ye we took it for like 10 mins. but it wasnt ment to be held anyways, so easy come easy go.
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Blondy on November 10, 2007, 10:14:29 PM
Quote from: zthrx on November 10, 2007, 09:55:21 PM
sure we sent pt there, but u attacked us and u failed <3

failed??? :D we engraving and soe to innadril ;), was not priority to get giran and lose innadril, that was under mega attack  :o
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: darkling on November 10, 2007, 10:45:19 PM
Thanks again to friends from MILICIA, you were great help at this siege.


Btw. when I saw the MASS of temps, syndicate and fearless coming I was like wtf we`r doomed;s
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: PvtStuka on November 10, 2007, 10:48:20 PM
Quote from: darkling on November 10, 2007, 10:45:19 PM
Thanks again to friends from MILICIA, you were great help at this siege.


Btw. when I saw the MASS of temps, syndicate and fearless coming I was like wtf we`r doomed;s

which keep getting bigger every day
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Efx on November 10, 2007, 10:53:04 PM
Yea it was very interesting and funny siege im looking to dion tomorrow :)
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: PainMaster on November 11, 2007, 12:04:50 AM
Quote from: zthrx on November 10, 2007, 10:47:13 PM
yea situation was look different from 2 others points of view :>


to bad that your point was x2
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: D3V1L5T4R on November 11, 2007, 05:24:34 AM
cmon guys... be serious.

i know that deathcrush had close to 300ppl online (285tbh, a friend told me) and fearless had 42ppl online.
we were alone at giran. and supported synd with 2pt at innadrill. and there were full deathcrush + militia.

when milita + deathcrush isn't a zerg, who is? oh sry, fearless is ^^


doesn't matter anyway
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Trylo on November 11, 2007, 06:30:56 AM
Quote from: D3V1L5T4R on November 11, 2007, 05:24:34 AM
cmon guys... be serious.

i know that deathcrush had close to 300ppl online (285tbh, a friend told me) and fearless had 42ppl online.
we were alone at giran. and supported synd with 2pt at innadrill. and there were full deathcrush + militia.

when milita + deathcrush isn't a zerg, who is? oh sry, fearless is ^^


doesn't matter anyway

Did had Fearless in best times 285 ppl online? This is faking big number. Ur friend is talking bullsh1t and u belive him. I newer saw so much ppl online in 1 ally, its over 30 partys :D. It looks like some1 was watching with Zerg Eye and count even shadows and random ghosts.
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Ecthelion on November 11, 2007, 08:39:21 AM
Quote from: Trylo on November 11, 2007, 06:30:56 AM
Did had Fearless in best times 285 ppl online? This is faking big number. Ur friend is talking bullsh1t and u belive him. I newer saw so much ppl online in 1 ally, its over 30 partys :D. It looks like some1 was watching with Zerg Eye and count even shadows and random ghosts.

Winnie the Pooh told him, that we had 300 ppl online.
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Ecthelion on November 11, 2007, 08:44:29 AM
Quote from: D3V1L5T4R on November 11, 2007, 05:24:34 AM
cmon guys... be serious.

i know that deathcrush had close to 300ppl online (285tbh, a friend told me) and fearless had 42ppl online.
we were alone at giran. and supported synd with 2pt at innadrill. and there were full deathcrush + militia.

when milita + deathcrush isn't a zerg, who is? oh sry, fearless is ^^


doesn't matter anyway

Yea, and Chuck Norris, Steven Seagal and Bruce Lee (we ressurected him) were there and helped us. Oh, i forgot some martian from the space make a space attack on u.
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Blondy on November 11, 2007, 10:32:13 AM
Quote from: D3V1L5T4R on November 11, 2007, 05:24:34 AM

i know that deathcrush had close to 300ppl online (285tbh, a friend told me) and fearless had 42ppl online.
we were alone at giran. and supported synd with 2pt at innadrill. and there were full deathcrush + militia.

you even dont know how looks full deathcrush, not even milicia


everybody on this two sieges has seen, who need many ppls to make a tie in CS ;), and how much allys

but it is a question of time, when DC get bored from this and the server get in the same "sh1t" as it was w/o DC ally. no CS, no PVP, becouse the "pro kids" from fearless are mega hardly zerged every time even 130 vs 135

i have enough this flames : "you are zerg, you have 5 full partys on baium (we never had more than 3  ;D ) , this is the reason why im every time angry on this game, a week back i have relax on this game, laughed on TS but now, we are suprised from your "stupidity", how you excuse your defeath. I have question if Fearless in the best time has the same behaviour like you now? when yes- you was not so strong  :D, and use the same tactic (stupid but true) like now ---> flame mode on, everybody is zerg, everybody has [ (1party x 3)^2 + 2x(radnom assslickes) ] -> asslickers are belong to you ;)

peac with you i will take a little brake from L2 now, my nerves are on ground now  :-\ -----> joke  :o  :P
cia on Dion ;)
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Ecthelion on November 11, 2007, 11:04:49 AM
Quote from: D3V1L5T4R on November 11, 2007, 05:24:34 AM
cmon guys... be serious.

i know that deathcrush had close to 300ppl online (285tbh, a friend told me) and fearless had 42ppl online.
we were alone at giran. and supported synd with 2pt at innadrill. and there were full deathcrush + militia.

when milita + deathcrush isn't a zerg, who is? oh sry, fearless is ^^


doesn't matter anyway

Oh, and i forgot, we have 1000 dwarfs in towns for shopping, and we want invite whole server in DC and rename all from DN community to DC community. Rofl, be serious man or go buy new brain, if u have one now....
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Probocis on November 11, 2007, 11:25:56 AM
(http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/9475/shot00017su2.png)
this is zerg and they are more then you see in me screen :)
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Blondy on November 11, 2007, 11:35:33 AM
btw, where is the post from Giran CS yesterday??  :o
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Furesy on November 11, 2007, 11:52:50 AM
Quote from: Probocis on November 11, 2007, 11:25:56 AM
(http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/9475/shot00017su2.png)
this is zerg and they are more then you see in me screen :)
lol @ the BD bot in right lower corner.
Interesting siege ;O Not even 1 OE weapon o_O'
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: muthafucker on November 11, 2007, 12:01:21 PM
Quote from: Furesy on November 11, 2007, 11:52:50 AM
lol @ the BD bot in right lower corner.
Interesting siege ;O Not even 1 OE weapon o_O'
rofl bot xD
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Soviete on November 11, 2007, 12:09:28 PM
Quote from: PainMaster on November 11, 2007, 12:04:50 AM



to bad that your point was x2

ROFL!

-----
Whisky Tango Foxtrot is Militia?

BTW i never see how many attackers at a castle like yesterday. xD

@Devul: TEMP + SIND + FEARLESS = Zergzors
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: bonio on November 11, 2007, 12:12:43 PM
to thread autor...

BUY NEW CALENDAR

;D
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: PvtStuka on November 11, 2007, 12:39:45 PM
come on Blondy, take it easy... no matter who is the enemy, there has to be flames to piss them, to make them fight against you. back in a year, that was fenix, and those who flame DC now, flamed fenix that time. after the downtime, they begged them to come back... it will be the same if you stop fighting, so just take it easy and do the pvp


@ Furesy: yah, not many OE weapon, this is not dragon ;)
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Blondy on November 11, 2007, 12:45:03 PM
Quote from: bonio on November 11, 2007, 12:12:43 PM
to thread autor...

BUY NEW CALENDAR

;D

ty, wrong date on PC  ::)
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: muthafucker on November 11, 2007, 02:23:45 PM
Quote from: D3V1L5T4R on November 11, 2007, 05:24:34 AM
cmon guys... be serious.

i know that deathcrush had close to 300ppl online (285tbh, a friend told me) and fearless had 42ppl online.
we were alone at giran. and supported synd with 2pt at innadrill. and there were full deathcrush + militia.

when milita + deathcrush isn't a zerg, who is? oh sry, fearless is ^^


doesn't matter anyway
omfg ahahaha roflmao i never saw such a funny post xDD
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: thehero on November 11, 2007, 08:59:06 PM
Quote from: D3V1L5T4R on November 11, 2007, 05:24:34 AM
cmon guys... be serious.

i know that deathcrush had close to 300ppl online (285tbh, a friend told me) and fearless had 42ppl online.
we were alone at giran. and supported synd with 2pt at innadrill. and there were full deathcrush + militia.

when milita + deathcrush isn't a zerg, who is? oh sry, fearless is ^^


doesn't matter anyway
ok  ok   what  is   a  zerg ?
i  will  tell u
zerg  is  the  number  that  u  cant  count  ?
zerg  is  the  number  that make's  u  flee ?
u  know  what  i  felt  and  i  said  to  my  self  when  i  saw  that ?
i  said :  fak  i  didnt  got  enowh  arrows  and  shot's   for  this .
true  i  wasnt  afraid  of  numbers  but  the  fact  that  i  would  propably  run out  of  ammo.
this  is  zerg  for  me  and  noone  of  the above.
and  that was  there  yesterday.
Title: Re: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: Nefacio on November 12, 2007, 06:10:09 AM
Furesy take a look to the other side, trust me they were OE weapons.

My opinion about Inhadril siege, there was an ubreakable human wall, but defence wasnt held very well, nevertless was enough.
Title: Re: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: D3V1L5T4R on November 12, 2007, 10:51:03 AM
true nefa...

sadly i had to leave the siege place a bit earlier, cause i was pk... sh1t happenz ;D
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: D3V1L5T4R on November 12, 2007, 10:52:16 AM
Quote from: Probocis on November 11, 2007, 11:25:56 AM
(http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/9475/shot00017su2.png)
this is zerg and they are more then you see in me screen :)

hey probociss, i critted you for 13k damage ;D
sad that i forgot to make a ss..  :'(  put on jewels :D

hope there will be some more good sieges in future...
Title: Re: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: HortinhaPortugal on November 12, 2007, 11:21:12 AM
There was an interesting thing that happened in the siege.
Voudas69 started the siege by diying near us on purpose to call us Noobs :)
I told him... "Yes...we are noobs but we are many."

Actually many of us in Milicia are not really great players in PvP.
We Milicia lack in many PvP skills. We dont make PK when we should we act sometimes really noobish sometimes.
If we are even in numbers with heroes or Sins we are all the time owned.

However, we own them in a different way. DC and Milicia own them in social relationship and with a trustfully ally. How many posts you see in the forum flaming voudas? How many posts saying I dont like heroes or voudas... etc....
We have an ally with people that we trust, mainly Portuguese speaking people and some people speaking spanish.
One more thing.. we are growing in number. My clan for example, Has many people that are not going to siege just because they started playing and are leveling up.

How many new blooded players do you have?

In general you are a bunch of selfish ppl.

I dont get offended if you call us Zerg. It's kinda true. Actually in Starcraft I loved to play with Zerg.

There are people that will not agree with what I'm saying. We have some very good people in PvP and they dont like what is written here.
But this is my opinion regarding our ally in general.

Title: Re: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: Furesy on November 12, 2007, 12:17:12 PM
Quote from: HortinhaPortugal on November 12, 2007, 11:21:12 AM
There was an interesting thing that happened in the siege.
Voudas69 started the siege by diying near us on purpose to call us Noobs :)
I told him... "Yes...we are noobs but we are many."

Actually many of us in Milicia are not really great players in PvP.
We Milicia lack in many PvP skills. We dont make PK when we should we act sometimes really noobish sometimes.
If we are even in numbers with heroes or Sins we are all the time owned.

However, we own them in a different way. DC and Milicia own them in social relationship and with a trustfully ally. How many posts you see in the forum flaming voudas? How many posts saying I dont like heroes or voudas... etc....
We have an ally with people that we trust, mainly Portuguese speaking people and some people speaking spanish.
One more thing.. we are growing in number. My clan for example, Has many people that are not going to siege just because they started playing and are leveling up.

How many new blooded players do you have?

In general you are a bunch of selfish ppl.

I dont get offended if you call us Zerg. It's kinda true. Actually in Starcraft I loved to play with Zerg.

There are people that will not agree with what I'm saying. We have some very good people in PvP and they dont like what is written here.
But this is my opinion regarding our ally in general.


+1 for you.
Pro post imo
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Probocis on November 12, 2007, 01:25:18 PM
Quote from: D3V1L5T4R on November 12, 2007, 10:52:16 AM
hey probociss, i critted you for 13k damage ;D
sad that i forgot to make a ss..  :'(  put on jewels :D

hope there will be some more good sieges in future...
on tyrant i have low m def ;/ about 850 with cov 1k :/
Title: Re: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: Furesy on November 12, 2007, 01:46:54 PM
Probo why the fk you use Vicious Stance with bow actually o_O?
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Kamillo29 on November 12, 2007, 01:58:14 PM
Quote from: D3V1L5T4R on November 12, 2007, 10:52:16 AM
hey probociss, i critted you for 13k damage ;D

if u dunno nubcake he/tt doesnt have mdef passives..so with s grade jewl+4 is still around 850-900 so dont be so pro with your dmg....ur black elf u should at least made cryt like 20k
Title: Re: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: Probocis on November 12, 2007, 03:22:16 PM
Quote from: Furesy on November 12, 2007, 01:46:54 PM
Probo why the fk you use Vicious Stance with bow actually o_O?
why not ? :)
Title: Re: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: Furesy on November 12, 2007, 03:26:31 PM
Quote from: Probocis on November 12, 2007, 03:22:16 PM
why not ? :)
Vicious Stance doesn't work with bow lol
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Akon on November 12, 2007, 03:27:22 PM
Quote from: Kamillo29 on November 12, 2007, 01:58:14 PM
if u dunno nubcake he/tt doesnt have mdef passives..so with s grade jewl+4 is still around 850-900 so dont be so pro with your dmg....ur black elf u should at least made cryt like 20k

if u pro, dont know use char, is ur problem.
i play on 5x, jewels S + 3/4 and i can reach 2.4k m def wiith totten, is that enough for u? if u say "aaa u are using totten", ok.. without this is ~1.9k  so? still enough? maybe not in a starwarserver :P
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: D3V1L5T4R on November 12, 2007, 03:29:43 PM
Quote from: Kamillo29 on November 12, 2007, 01:58:14 PM
if u dunno nubcake he/tt doesnt have mdef passives..so with s grade jewl+4 is still around 850-900 so dont be so pro with your dmg....ur black elf u should at least made cryt like 20k

believe me, my setups are good enough  ;)
i like to play in that way. but making a 20k crit on 900mdef is kinda hard tbh  :)

@hortinha: fair post. but i dont think that you can say generally that we are all selfish... we are a smaller group of ppl, trusting and helping each other. and we have some new guys. not new to game but new in clan. f.e. i am a sinner since about 3months now... and i'm proud to be one  :)
i usually don't flame and stuff, but sometimes it comes over me.. when i'm a bit angry or just pissed about some ppl and the way they like to see things. i have these moments too, i know that, but i try to keep them as few as possible. i don't cry about being zerged, i like the challenge, but i'm getting pissed when some guys think they are pwning when they kill you in 7vs2 or sth...

ps: in starcraft I v.1.0 zerg were fcking uberpwning, thats why the costs of the pool has been increased in all following versions ;) just spam zerglings and mutalisks and the victory is yours... at the beginning it was like that  :)
Title: Re: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: Probocis on November 12, 2007, 03:32:32 PM
Quote from: Furesy on November 12, 2007, 03:26:31 PM
Vicious Stance doesn't work with bow lol
for me works maybe if you have cat buff dosent work
Title: Re: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: Furesy on November 12, 2007, 03:38:28 PM
Quote from: Probocis on November 12, 2007, 03:32:32 PM
for me works maybe if you have cat buff dosent work
Wanna bet it doesn't work at all? Drake disabled it for bow a long time ago.
It simply doesn't work when using bows.
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Quido on November 12, 2007, 03:41:14 PM
Quote from: Probocis on November 11, 2007, 11:25:56 AM
(http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/9475/shot00017su2.png)
this is zerg and they are more then you see in me screen :)
zerg?  dont u remamber fenix hordes?
Title: Re: 2007-11-10 Innadril siege
Post by: thehero on November 12, 2007, 04:02:58 PM
Quote from: HortinhaPortugal on November 12, 2007, 11:21:12 AM
There was an interesting thing that happened in the siege.
Voudas69 started the siege by diying near us on purpose to call us Noobs :)
I told him... "Yes...we are noobs but we are many."

Actually many of us in Milicia are not really great players in PvP.
We Milicia lack in many PvP skills. We dont make PK when we should we act sometimes really noobish sometimes.
If we are even in numbers with heroes or Sins we are all the time owned.

However, we own them in a different way. DC and Milicia own them in social relationship and with a trustfully ally. How many posts you see in the forum flaming voudas? How many posts saying I dont like heroes or voudas... etc....
We have an ally with people that we trust, mainly Portuguese speaking people and some people speaking spanish.
One more thing.. we are growing in number. My clan for example, Has many people that are not going to siege just because they started playing and are leveling up.

How many new blooded players do you have?

In general you are a bunch of selfish ppl.

I dont get offended if you call us Zerg. It's kinda true. Actually in Starcraft I loved to play with Zerg.

There are people that will not agree with what I'm saying. We have some very good people in PvP and they dont like what is written here.
But this is my opinion regarding our ally in general.


ok  about  trustable ally:
we use  to  say   in  greece   : eat  a  big  bite  of  food  but  dont say  big  words.
about blooded  new  players  : look  the  above .
about  we  are  selfish  etc  : the  team work  in  siedges  and  pvp's  the  respect  between  us  and the  support  to  each  other   in  any  thing  shows   the oposite .
i  dont  know   were u  got  this  information  about  us   but   u  are  just   dreamming  in  deep  summer sleep  or  ur  informer  is .

Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Panzer on November 12, 2007, 04:06:23 PM
Quote from: Quido on November 12, 2007, 03:41:14 PM
zerg?  dont u remamber fenix hordes?

look better on the opposing side... the same numbers or more.

The forces were pretty much balanced on both sides at Innadril, was a nice siege.
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Kamillo29 on November 12, 2007, 05:27:00 PM
Quote from: Akon on November 12, 2007, 03:27:22 PM
if u pro, dont know use char, is ur problem.
i play on 5x, jewels S + 3/4 and i can reach 2.4k m def wiith totten, is that enough for u? if u say "aaa u are using totten", ok.. without this is ~1.9k  so? still enough? maybe not in a starwarserver :P

okay gimme me screen with tyrant "without totem" with 1,9k m def..im guess ur using tallum robe+mdef dyes and running with pow(water one) :P

screen or lies
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: AmunZen on November 12, 2007, 05:29:58 PM
Quote from: D3V1L5T4R on November 12, 2007, 03:29:43 PM

i usually don't flame
whats flame?.. i never did that.. shame on the ppl that flame
Title: Re: 2007-11-12 Innadril siege
Post by: Akon on November 12, 2007, 08:16:14 PM
Quote from: Kamillo29 on November 12, 2007, 05:27:00 PM
okay gimme me screen with tyrant "without totem" with 1,9k m def..im guess ur using tallum robe+mdef dyes and running with pow(water one) :P

screen or lies
try for urself.

NO zerk, m barrier, song warding, m def pot and CoV.